Ask a blockchain advocate and you’ll hear all about how decentralized databases are primed to save the world. But if you ask 43 high-profile blockchain technology startups what they’ve built since raising funds, you’ll hear nothing but crickets.
This article was originally published on Futurism. This is just a theme demo site.
At least, that’s what happened when MERL Tech, a technology research firm that monitors trends in emerging technology, reached out to blockchain companies about their work. The firm’s conclusion is that blockchain startups are promising big and delivering nothing.
Investigating The Ledger
In a report published Thursday, MERL Tech documented the ambitious whitepapers and apparently too-good-to-be-true claims of 43 blockchain startups that were featured prominently on internet searches. MERL Tech’s team found no evidence that these companies actually delivered any sort of functional products or services — not even any sort of updates on how their work was coming along. And reaching out directly yielded nothing but radio silence.
A blockchain is a sort of distributed database that advocates argue will increase transparency by redistributing power. The idea is that everyone who buys in will have their own copy of anything that happens on a blockchain — for example, cryptocurrency transactions — so no centralized entity like a big bank could hold too much power.
But many question whether or not blockchain tech actually serves a purpose. Often, blockchain seems like a buzzword that tech startups add to their pitch decks in order to attract investments.
Of course, 43 individual startups do not represent the entire blockchain industry. It’s possible that MERL Tech, which likely acted in good faith, happened to investigate some bad apples or select shadier companies. Ultimately, take this as a warning to do your due diligence before buying into a new blockchain company’s bold claims. It’s worth checking how far your money will actually go.